Monitors

HP P22 G5 21.5″ Full HD Monitor (64X86AS)

270,00 د.إ
Display size (diagonal) 21.5" Display size (diagonal) 54.6 cm (21.5") Panel technology IPS Display features On-screen controls; Low blue light mode; Anti-glare Color gamut 72% NTSC Onscreen controls Brightness; Input control; Management; Information; Exit; Color control; Image control; Power control; Menu control Native resolution FHD (1920 x 1080)

HP P24 G5 23.8 inch FHD Monitor (64X66AS)

85,00 د.إ
  • 60.5 cm (23.8) FHD (1920 x 1080 @ 75 Hz)
  • Flat IPS with Edge-lit
  • 1 HDMI 1.4, 1 VGA, 1 DisplayPort™ 1.2
  • Tilt Stand
  • On-screen controls, Low blue light mode, Anti-glare

HP P27 G5 FHD Monitor (64X69AS)

129,00 د.إ

HP S7 Pro 727pk 4K TB4 MONITOR (8J9G2AA)

700,00 د.إ
  • Display size (diagonal): 68.6 cm (27")
  • Response time (typical): 5ms GtG (with overdrive) 
  • Native resolution: 4K UHD (3840 x 2160)

HP S7 Pro 727pq QHD MONITOR (8J4D8AA)

450,00 د.إ
  • Display size (diagonal): 68.6 cm (27")
  • Response time (typical): 5ms GtG (with overdrive) 
  • Native resolution: QHD (2560 x 1440) 

HP Series 7 Pro 34 inch WQHD Conferencing Monitor – 734pm (8K157AA)

1.135,00 د.إ
  • Display size (diagonal): 86.4 cm (34")
  • Response time (typical): 5ms GtG (with overdrive) 
  • Native resolution: WQHD (3440 x 1440)

HP Series 7 Pro 37.5 inch WQHD+ Thunderbolt 4 Monitor – 738pu (8K167AA)

1.300,00 د.إ
  • Display size (diagonal): 95.3 cm (37.5")
  • Response time (typical): 5ms GtG (with overdrive) 1
  • Native resolution: WQHD+ (3840 x 1600)

Online store of household appliances and electronics

Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.

A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.