Showing 121–132 of 1173 results
Canon RF 100mm f/2.8 L Macro IS USM Lens
- RF-Mount Lens/Full-Frame Format
- 1.4x Magnification with Autofocus
- Aperture Range: f/2.8 to f/32
- Minimum Focusing Distance: 10.2"
- Super Spectra Coating
- Smooth and Quiet Auto Focus
- Optical Image Stabilization; Hybrid IS
- Control Ring for Direct Setting Changes
- 9-Blade Diaphragm
- Weather-Sealed Construction
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4 L IS USM Lens
Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8 L IS USM Lens
Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM Lens
Canon RF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM
Canon RF 24-50mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM Lens
Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8 L IS USM Lens
Canon RF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Lens
Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Lens
Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Lens
- RF-Mount Lens/Full-Frame Format
- Aperture Range: f/2.8 to f/32
- One Super UD Element, One UD Element
- Two Aspherical Elements
- Air Sphere and Fluorine Coatings
- Dual Nano USM AF System
- Optical Image Stabilizer
- Customizable Control Ring
- Detachable, Rotatable Tripod Collar
- Rounded 9-Blade Diaphragm
Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM Lens
Canon XF605 UHD 4K HDR Pro Camcorder
Canon XF605 UHD 4K HDR Pro Camcorder
- 1" CMOS Sensor, 4:2:2 10-Bit
- H.265/H.264 MP4 Format, XF-AVC
- UHD 4K up to 60 fps, 1080p to 120 fps
- iOS App | 15x Optical/30x Digital Zoom
- Dual-Pixel CMOS Autofocus Feature
- HDR Recording, Canon Log 3, Wide DR
- 12G-SDI, HDMI & USB-C Outputs
- Optical & Digital Stabilization
- Four XLR Inputs, 4-Channel LPCM Audio
- Discrete Focus, Iris, Zoom Lens Rings
Online store of household appliances and electronics
Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.
A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.
